New Beginnings Coming

A series of unavoidable events have prevented us from making a final edit of the site and posting new material. All this we hope to recommence about the first of the year. Two new books of poetry will be featured, as well as commentaries on various issues and subjects. Please contact the site, if desired.

Eric

P.S. some very early poems, just grabbed from the poetry bag.

*************

Journal:  April 24, 1971

****************

1.

The kiss you gave me

When my heart was sad,

Left me still as lonely,

As if it were never had.

Perhaps it’s true my darling,

That I blame you for too much;

But how lonely is my yearning,

And how absent is your touch!

We've had our trials, true;

And, at times, it’s hard to know,

If this pain I feel with you

Will lessen soon or further grow.

This, then, is my confession:

My love, though troubled, is so true,

That, through all of this confusion,

If you want, I’ll stand by you.

 2

Though the times are ever changing,

And every dream seems washed away,

Though love is always searching

By giving you’ll find your way.

Spare not your love

As you listen to the rain,

Though all the seasons are crying of

This love so full of pain.

                

3.

Like the silence of the desert,

Or the lonely sound of rain;

Like some special thing that’s lost,

I’m moved to sing your name.

O, darling girl, I see you,

Life’s trials mark your face;

Many nights I held you,

Many fears we had to face.

You said you wanted something new,

Another life to start;

You said you wanted something new,

With that you broke my heart.

Through many streets I've wandered

And of all the things I've dreamed,

Your love is most remembered,

Remembered as it was, or seemed.

                4,

O, darling girl, I miss you,

Sometimes I need you so;

But your love it wasn't true,

And so you had to go.

You hurt me at you will,

And took my love for granted;

O, darling why’d you kill

The very thing you wanted?

In the rain I hear you calling,

In the movement of the trees,

At night when stars are burning,

When autumn stirs dead leaves.

                 5.

Song of Nefertiti

The sun is setting;

O river, bathed in flame,

How I love the evening

When he comes to me again!

How cool the air is streaming

In silence my soul is steeped

How I love the evening

When all the world ‘s asleep.

Soon the stars will shine

In blazing worlds of light,

And that man will soon be mine,

In deepest dreams of night.

A silver moon is rising,

The heavens are decreed;

And in my heart there stirs a yearning

For all the love I need. 

                                               

Freud's Murder Remembered: John Freud's Birthday, August 13, 1855:

Ever since officially documenting, apparently for the first time, John Freud's (officially, Johann Freudt's) true birth date in 1982, I have, in my way, commemorated his birthday on August 13th of each year.

Official records available in my book (see, www.passionformurder.com ) show that Johann Freud (the Czechs spelled Freud with a final "t", "Freudt") was born on August 13, 1855. My research also authenticated that Johann's famous half-brother (nominally his "nephew") was not, as all the thousands of psychologists, psychoanalysts, psychiatrists, biographers, and Freud himself and school records had it, on May 6, 1856, but rather March 6, 1855. The fact makes Sigmund's birth more than two months too soon as Freud's mother was married to Jakob on July 29, 1955--days, incidentally, before John was born).

Under the weight of the facts of the case, it is our position Freud's mother was impregnated, not by her husband, Jakob, who was some 20 years older than herself, but by Jakob's eldest son, Emanuel, who was about the same age as Freud's mother, Amalia, and a social contemporary. Indeed, at the time of Sigmund's birth, Emanuel was already married, and had a baby (i.e., Johann) nearly 7 months old by his own young wife, Maria. Jakob married Amalia to give Sigmund's illegitimate birth the semblance of legitimacy. Emanuel was forbidden by bigamy laws to marry Amalia, even if he wanted to. It is worth nothing that shortly before Jakob's marriage to Amalia, his own previous wife of some years "mysteriously disappeared"--with no record of her death and with fraudulent official attestations by Jakob about the fact that he even had a wife at the relevant period.  Even Freud "believers" have speculated that Jakob might have been the cause of her "disappearance"--never to be heard of again.

In any case, it was in 1982 I first contacted the then Communist (technically Socialist Republic) Czechoslovakian Embassy in Washington, D.C. and made a special request to obtain birth date records of Freud family members in the little hamlet of Fribor, the one-time home of the Freud clan before their breakup with emigrations to Vienna, Austria and Manchester, England. Actually, it was necessary, for the Czechoslovakian government to arrange a special research effort be launched to obtain the records. The Senior Czech Ambassador was unexpectedly helpful. Relations between the U.S. and Czechoslovakia were still politically strained. No one apparently had ever obtained the official birth records before I arranged, and paid for, researchers to go to Fribor to obtain then. The information was a crucial part of my research on my expose of Sigmund Freud as a serial killer.

The importance of John Freud, Sigmund's half-brother, to my research was simply the fact that I had deduced from Freud's writings and independent biographical studies, that Johann (John) was most probably Freud's first murder victim. The murder took place while Sigmund was on a vacation trip to Manchester, England, where Emanuel Freud and his family had emigrated. It was in the summer of 1875, when Sigmund was 19 and John was 20, or about to turn 20 within a matter of days.

How Freud had murdered John, where, the circumstances of the murder, and the pre-and post murder evidence will be disclosed in detail in forthcoming works soon to be available in eBooks and/or hard bound volumes. They will be made as inexpensively as possible to allow for the greatest number of people, interested in such things, to have the information available to them.

Whether there actually is an extraordinarily high probability that Freud murdered his half-brother, John, (a probability beyond, it is claimed, "reasonable doubt") each reader can decide for themselves. The reader ought keep in mind, of course, that, by definition, a serial killer must kill a minimum of 3 people, with a "cooling off" period between each murder. So, John is only the first. But, the "first" is, to serial killers, often their "prototype"--they murder over and over again the same "image" which is pathologically seated in their minds and imaginations. In Freud's case we have to deal with at least some 5 known or highly probable murders.

The relevance of Freud as a murderer culturally continues to this day, despite the fact that the "reign" of Freud is virtually almost totally eclipsed (save in certain circles of  the now defunct "science of psychoanalysis" and/or in certain forms of Jewish culturalism which has at its heart a "religious veneration" for Freud as the new "Moses"). Freud as a serial killer is still a matter of importance to the world, however, and in particular, we observe, it should be to America where the Cult/Con of Freudianism was aided and abetted through a propaganda campaign to the extent of extolling him as "one of the greatest men to have ever lived." In reality, Freud, with his hatred of his own Jewish people, his lust for murder, and his megalomania, more resembles Adolf Hitler than any good-spirited ordinary person--"most people," Freud wrote secretly to a friend are nothing but "trash" and could be "gotten rid of if one wished." Even Hitler, I think, would not have dared to disclosing in writing what was really in his heart! Ironically, Hitler, professed himself to be a Christian, whereas Freud, an avowed atheist, accused the Jewish people genetically, en mass, of murdering Moses and having to pay for that crime!

But, here we pause to remember Johann Freud. His "mysterious disappearance" (immediately after Sigmund's murder of him in 1875) cannot make us forget him. Sigmund Freud, in one of his Serial-Killer "game-like" confessions to the murder of Johann (serial killers love to confess to their "trophies"), plays-off a word game of his own invention about Johann in Latin. It is to be found in his famous confessional "dream book" Die Traumdeutung (The Interpretation of Dream). Regarding Johann he wrote of him that he was "non vixit". Non vixit, in Latin, means "he never existed"--not "non vivit", he no longer lives." The "joke", of course, is, if he "never existed" Sigmund could never have murdered him! Get it?

Well, we do get it, we get it that Sigmund murdered John and the whole confraternity of Freudians psychoanalysis have been (some wittingly, some not) giving their most heroic effort to conceal the facts of his diseased mind and spirit from the public--by whatever means necessary (concealing of evidence, corruption of text, manipulation of historical data, outright lies, etc.).

To her great credit, Sophie Freud, Freud's granddaughter, an internationally distinguished Professor Emerita, in the MSW field, and a great student of Freud biographies, who has studied virtually every main biography on Freud, has fearlessly recently stepped forward to publicly face the facts of who her grandfather really was. She honors her Great Uncle, John Freud's life, by conceding that Grandfather Freud murdered him.

To see her amazing comment on this matter, see my website www.passionformurder.com. .  

More later.

Eric

 

Trayvon Martin & George Zimmerman: "The Huge Hypocrisy of the World" & The Media

They are at it again, the self-serving media. The courts excluded "irrelevant" personal history information for Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, as appropriate in a trial for the facts of the matter of the killing of Trayvon. But, that's not a conspiracy, that's an appropriate legal procedure. It is otherwise with our "money-mad media", they have all conspired to keep facts of Martin and Zimmerman from the American public debate on the matter--because it doesn't serve their economic or political interests. Though the following facts may not be relevant to the murder trial, they are relevant, perhaps, to understanding the reality of the situation. If the following are indeed facts of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman they ought to be included in the discussion of the matter.

Anyone who wants to know the facts can easily google "Trayvon Martin jewel theft" to discover that he (in February, if I recall correctly) apparently burglarized a home in the area and made off with gold, silver, and diamonds." He was stopped by the school police, when he was appearing suspicious, and the officer found 12 pieces of jewelry and a burglary tool in his back-pack. Because of the politics of the school police, they quit arresting Blacks at the school, because it was making them look bad and perhaps jeopardizing their pay raises. This is what is reported and has been uncovered by seemingly responsible journalists--if it is not true the record should be corrected. The jewelry was confiscated and taken to the police office--the local family who had been burglarized was not even at the time informed of it. Trayvon was not even arrested, but just let go. If the police had done their job, Trayvon would have had to account for his actions and who knows, if that were on his record. how he might have otherwise responded to Zimmerman. The police, it would seem, have responsibility for their own malfeasance. They may have even committed a crime in their handling of the case.

And, by the turning of the worm, George Zimmerman was not the helpless wimp that they tried to make out, but had been arrested for domestic violence and assaulting a police officer in a bar--when the policeman was questioning a friend of his for selling liquor to a minor. Zimmerman reportedly slugged the police officer in the face. Is it possible George's father being a Judge (and maybe ethnically Jewish?) had anything to do with George get off easily, as he appears to have? Perhaps race or ethnicity or position of influence may well have had an influence here, too?   

Not one news network, that I know of--this includes CNN, MSNBC, FOX, etc., not one of our great leader "talking heads" has dared to mention any of this. They are too busy making money by glutting the networks with the case and pushing their political agendas--all of them!.

If this information, which is easy for anyone to google is not true, please let me know, so that I can correct this comment or just delete it for want of the truth.

ELM

VELIKOVSKY SPECIAL and Coming Attractions

Readers, we will soon be posting, if there is reader interest, additional new material on the subject of Immanuel Velikovsky and his works. If any reader finds material at this site which they challenge, please let us know. If the case is good, we will make necessary corrections.

Please stay tuned, more information will soon be posted here at this blog. As one whom Velikovsky counted amongst his personal friends and personally encouraged on many fronts, we are in a position to make some unique contributions to the history of the "Velikovsky saga."

Some 100 pages of correspondence between Velikovsky and myself will be found at the Velikovsky Archives site at Princeton University. More material exists which, for one reason or another, was not included in the collection. Additionally, numerous personal conversations with Velikovsky were contemporaneously recorded by me in paged and hard bound Journals--these recordations provide rich material for various details which may be of interest to the scholar or person of general interest.

If the reader finds at this site remarks or information they believe to be inaccurate or simply wrong, we will upon confirmation of errors, correct them. Velikovsky counted this writer as a personal friend and encouraged me to make my views public. He used much of my material in his book Mankind In Amnesia and even encouraged me to publish my works before his own--as he himself stated that I had insights and knowledge that went beyond his own. This fact is proved by the correspondence at Princeton University.

The reader may contact us at the below email address. Nothing of a respondent's communications will be published at this site without their explicit approval in writing. No email address will ever be used to solicit anything nor will it be shared with any other entity.

Give it a try, reply. Correct us or query us about any related matters.

Eric Miller
www.emiller731@yahoo.com

A Sonnet to Ruth and Minos Miller

                 
                     A poet’s life is plagued with anxious strife,
                     for living art’s true song too few have care;
                     and most to honest effort would give knife,
                     then give just praise to those whose art would dare.
                     To educate the world (true poet’s cause),
                     the world does most resist: for Ignorance
                     is comfort’s cloak, mediocrity’s applause,
                     the profit of pretenders, false scholar’s nonce.
                     And so, from you who love, who dare, who care,
                     and give encouragement to art’s true course,
                     whose hearts are open, whose minds are fair,
                     we poets get our prize, our strength, our force.
                       So you who honor poets, yourselves are due
                       the highest praise, for you help Art renew.

                      elm

Ruth and Minos were very encouraging to my efforts and though I did not know them long, Ruth especially urged me on and, even when ill, had me read some of my poems over the phone, especially those dealing with Oxford, Anne Vavasour, Spenser, etc. No one has yet seen them and this is the first of that "lot" that I herewith make public. For many years before I became involved in the Oxford movement, the Miller's (not related) had a play contest with a handsome prize for the annual winner. My own plays (the Lord Oxford Trilogy) are posted on website: http://www.ericmillerworks.com/

Two Sonnets For The Season - from The Marie Sonnets

Base Beauty 

As rotted dung gives birth to beauty's rose,

And by its action urges sweet perfume,

So, too, obnoxious fate may fertilize,

Pernicious deeds to laudatory bloom.

Life's transformations are most curious,

The soil that beds the seed, now odious,

In time, sweet loam, the home of loveliness;

And then decay and rot, continuous.

From base beginnings, then, the rarest rose

May rise triumphant from earth's excrement;

Its claim to beauty unopposed – so goes

The Way of Life with Birth and Death's intent.

From nature's wisdom we must take our cue,

Whatever fortune's fate or season's due.

Those Changing Times 

Those hurting times of change the heart endures

When peril, suffering, loss, is meted out

And battered hopes all happiness obscures

And promised peace is given war-like rout,

Then to Change's change we must give hope

And season wintry sorrow with spring's song –

Though all our heart would steep itself in mope,

Decrying fate's offense and time's great wrong.

Change is nature's gift, to all Creation given,

Unfailing, ever to be counted on,

Creation's covenant, direct from Heaven,

Which, always true, is faith's enduring beacon.

In time all things will to Completion's Ends

Save Change itself which Heaven itself defends.

by E.L. Miller

What do April 28, 1583, April 28th, 1603, and April 28, 2012 Have In Common?

On our site ericmillerworks.com we have just posted new evidence that Shakespeare's Sonnet 107 was written on or about April 28, 1583. Over six years ago, I had published my findings that Edward de Vere wrote Sonnet 107 at the time of the Firey Trigon, when an arrangement of the heavens, was supposed to cause the End of the World. Only a few weeks ago, we published here the second part of that story, with new evidence showing that Queen Elizabeth herself was in fear of her death, and terrified, as was much of Europe over the predicted End on April 28, 1853 at 12:00. (See "the Mortall Moone & The Firey Triogon--now posted).

On April 28th, 1603, Queen Elizabeth's funeral was held. The official funeral materials for the Oration and Elegy were stated to be "Written by: Infelice Academico Ignoto." Over a decade ago, I identified this Ignoto as Edward de Vere, and the fact that he had written the Queen's Oration and Elegy. Many key Oxfordians were noticed of this but remain silent and hide from these discoveries.

On April 28th, 2012, we publish here today, a new discovery of "Four Additional Poems Of Ignoto On Queen Elizabeth's Official Funeral Procession." Two of these poems were in the original documents I used for my discovery, but I did not know it, because of confusions in the record. With the help of another poet, I became aware of the fact that there was more than one part to the documents I had; it was in two parts!  Of these new "Ignoto" poems, two of them were included in the original proceeding and two others were separately published.

As I, and a great many other people, now believe, Edward de Vere  used the nom de plume of Shakespeare; he also used the name of Ignoto, so we also commenorate this date by publishing Ignoto (The Complete Poems) including In Prison Pent.

Today, April 28th, 2012, is a good day, as Edward de Vere finds proper credit for his work for Queen Elizabeth's funeral, and we have accomplished all in time to publish it to the world, this day in commenoration of that great event.

ericmillerworks.com

April 28, 2012
elm